s of Robustness Development in .NET Deploy Data Matrix in .NET s of Robustness Development

Examples of Robustness Development generate, create gs1 datamatrix barcode none on .net projects PDF-417 2d barcode Scenario 1 Suppose .net vs 2010 2d Data Matrix barcode that an environmental stress factor acts on design parameter A, which in turn has a nonlinear effect on the output response (Y). Figure 7.

6 illustrates this scenario, showing the following: Control parameter A is set where the output response (Y) is less sensitive.. Goalposts Angle of Flight (Y). Centerline (T) of G oalposts Upright Ball Placement A1 Angle of Ball Placement Tilted Ball Placement A2. Angle of Flight Shift Mean to Cente rline of Goalposts Low Approach Angle B1 High Approach Angle Angle of Approach B2 . Scenario 1: Tilting the placed football reduces the variability of the ight angle. From the Library of Wow! eBook Examples of Robustness Development There s no attemp t to reduce the effect of the stress on parameter A. Adjustment parameter B is set to shift the response back to its target (T). In the case of a stress affecting a manufacturing process, the nonlinearity of the function would enable the tolerance on parameter A to be relaxed to reduce manufacturing costs and still have reduced variability in the output response.

Consider our friend the eld goal kicker, discussed in 2. The kicking process includes the ball holder, who receives the ball from the center and places it to the best advantage of the kicker. For soccer-style kickers, that placement is with the ball laces facing away from the kicker s foot and the ball tilted slightly off vertical.

The parameter in question is the angle of tilt that works best for the particular kicker. Once the holder nds the right angle to minimize the variability in the ball s ight, the kicker can adjust his approach to the ball to shift the distribution back to be aligned with the centerline of the goalposts. The critical enabler is the nonlinear relationship between the angle of the ball, when positioned by the holder, and the variability of the angle of ight.

Scenario 2 Suppose that external stresses act on the output response (Y) in an unknown way. Experiments may identify two control parameters that interact in their effect on the output response. Figure 7.

7 may help you understand this story. One control parameter (B) is found to have variability due to the in uence of the stress. The second control parameter (A) is not vulnerable to the stress but is found to have an interaction with parameter B, reducing the variation caused in the output response (Y).

Parameter A is speci ed with a set point that reduces the vulnerability to those variations in parameter B that are caused by the external stresses.. Parameter (A): Shoe .NET data matrix barcodes Cleat Length Goalposts Short Cleats Angle of Flight (Y) Centerline (T) of Goalposts Angle of Flight Shift Mean to Centerline of Goalposts. Long Cleats Range of Foot Slippage Parameter (B): Stability of Anchor Foot on Muddy Field Increase Angle C1 to Shift Mean Parameter (C): Angle of Approach Scenario 2: Mud cleats reduce the variability of eld goal kicks. From the Library of Wow! eBook 7 . Robustness Development for Product Designs The in uence of t he stress on parameter B is not reduced. Parameter C is set to shift the response back to its target (T). In our eld-goal-kicking example, consider the increased variability when the natural grass playing eld is slippery and muddy.

The anchor foot that is planted just prior to the kick needs to be rmly positioned, so a slippery footing will increase the variability of the ball s ight. By changing the cleats of his shoes to longer ones, the kicker can increase the stability of that foot and reduce the variability in the kick under slippery conditions. It may shift the mean, which he can correct by adjusting his angle of approach.

Scenario 3 External stress acts directly on the output response (Y). Control parameter A is found to desensitize the output response (Y) from the effects of the stress. Adjustment parameter B is set to shift the response back to its target (T).

In Figure 7.8, Scenario 3 illustrates another problem for eld goal kicking: the wetness of the ball due to rain. The problem is more for the holder, who has to handle the ball, grab it again when it slips in his hands, and still get it placed in the right position before the kicker s foot hits the ball.

The wetter the ball, the greater the variability of its ight. This scenario depicts the case.
Copyright © . All rights reserved.